Joined in 2023 
82 
63 About this deal
If you're looking for something less expensive, you do have alternatives, and the LG 34GN850 remains a premium option. You can really think of this monitor as an ultrawide version of LG's excellent 27GL850. Response times are very similar, you get outstanding viewing angles, top notch wide gamut colors and factory calibration isn't too shabby either. Even IPS glow is improved, especially compared to the 34GK950F. If you're after an ultrawide that delivers an elite combination of speed and visual quality, with the possibility to double as a creative or productivity monitor, there is no better choice than the 34GN850. Comparing the 34GN850 to other monitors paints a very positive picture for the new LG ultrawide. As expected, we are seeing 27GL850-like performance from this monitor, almost matching its response time and inverse ghosting performance.
There's also the Faster overdrive mode available, but this is mostly just so LG can advertise a "1ms" response time with this display. Yeah, in this mode some transitions are 1ms or faster, but that comes at the expense of insane overshoot and inverse ghosting. This mode is unusable due to white trailing and haloing. The 34GN850 is also clearly faster than VA offerings, including speedy 200Hz G-Sync Ultimate displays like the Acer Predator X35. Options like the Nixeus NX-EDG34S which have in recent times pushed up to 144Hz with VA panels, are still mid-range contenders and don't really get close to what the 34GN850 is offering. The storage humidity shows the lower and upper humidity limit, which ensures safe storage of the display. Storing it outside these limits might damage the display.
The most widely used panels are those with 6, 8, and 10 bits for each of the RGB components of the pixel. They provide 18-, 24-, and 30-bit color, respectively. Speaking of things we like, how about the LG 34GN850’s immediate unboxed image quality. The Nano IPS panel is only rated at 1,000:1 for static contrast. That could imply a washed out image and maybe even IPS glow, which are problems some LG IPS monitors do exhibit. But not here. This 34-incher is rich, vibrant, saturated, punchy, and contrasty.
Adobe RGB (1998) is a color space, developed by Adobe Systems in 1998. It has a wider gamut than the sRGB (mainly in the cyan-green range of colors) and is widely used in professional printing. The ratio between the horizontal and the vertical side of the display. Some of the standard and widely used aspect ratios are 4:3, 5:4, 16:9 and 16:10. Information about the brightness of the screen. It is measured in candela per square metre (cd/m²). We know the 34GN850 uses 1ms class Nano IPS technology, so this should mean 27GL850-like performance right? Well, let's take a look, starting with the first of four included overdrive modes.
Approximate width of the display. If the manufacturer does not provide such information, the width is calculated from the diagonal and the aspect ratio. Information about the average amount of time, in which the pixels change from one color to another. Viewing angles are excellent as you'd expect from an IPS panel. Uniformity is a little below average with our unit, the bottom half was slightly warmer than the top half, which is a regression compared to the 34GK950F and this had a similar influence on grey uniformity. However, my 34GN850 had a lot less IPS glow in the bottom left and right corners than my 34GK950F, this monitor (at least our unit) was much better than average for IPS glow and while it's not perfect - very few IPS monitors are - I don't think you'll notice this issue in most conditions. What We Learned The main change LG has made with this year's ultrawide is the stand, which is smaller and has fewer visible red highlights. The 34GK950F had a large and wide Y-shaped stand with a circular pillar, which wasn't the easiest to operate for height adjustment. Our results after a DisplayCAL pass delivered sub 2.0 deltaE averages across the board for sRGB content, which is excellent. And then using the same profile for P3, again very strong deltaE results, the very top end is slightly inaccurate as we don't get full P3 coverage, but this is good enough for most creative work and well above average.
Great Deal 
New Comment